Human Elephant Conflict. Human Invasion Into The Wilderness Essay

homophile Elephant Conflict. Human Invasion Into The Wilderness - Essay ExampleThe article by Perera (2009) reported in Gajaha points out that about Asian nations are facing a drastic decline in the lean of elephants. Similar line was visible in Africa where the number of elephants declined from over 5 million to anywhere between 470,000 and 630,000 in a matter of hundred years. Thus, while the African elephants are termed near threatened by the IUCN Red List, their Asian counterparts are classified endangered by the Red List of the World Conservation northward (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2011). However, before blaming homo for all these, it is necessary to look into the numbers of every year manslaughter by elephants. According to Handwerk (2005), nearly 500 people are killed by elephants in a year, and the number is on rise year by year. Thus, it becomes evident that there is a skirmish between manpower and elephants. This work lo oks into the various factors behind the conflict and the various effects of the conflict. Human invasion into the wilderness- the first intellectual It is pointed out by Nelson et al (2003) that one moderateness for increased elephant-human contact is the changes in land use. state started converting forest land for crop cultivation, settlement, and livestock grazing. The scholars make the observation that as human landscape reached such bowls which were previously occupied by wildlife, there is higher chance for human-elephant conflict. Another point comes from Houghton (1994). ... Then, elephants move towards the farmlands and settlements in the near vicinity for water. There are many more reasons in the pipeline. According to Lahm (1996), one reason is logging. As already noted, elephants live on secondary vegetation and successional forest. When logging occurs, the cleared land gives deport to thick growth of secondary vegetation. Thus, elephants hightail it to move to t hese newly developed areas for food. Yet another spanking point as put forward by Kangwana (1995) is that increased human interference leads to the development of canals and cows fences. When such developments block the natural migration routes of elephants, and when humans settle along the boundaries of such protected areas, the possibility of human-elephant conflict increases. Also, there is the revelation from Naughton et al (1999) that as the economic situation of people has improved, there is a broad decline in tolerance to elephant presence. There is a totally different aspect of the issue explored by Anderson and Grove (1987). According to them, there are various factors that lead to the development of enmity in humans towards elephants (ibid). The most important factor is the development of national parks by governments. Such parks tend to exclude the local people making them feel alienated from the entire plan. As a result, the area becomes frozen in a short while. So, t he local people start resenting the wildlife, and dominant wild animals equal elephants are the main victims of this hostile attitude. The scholars argue that this resentment is exacerbated by the feeling that the animals have access to such political, economic, and land advantages which are inaccessible for the native people (ibid). Yeager and Miller